Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
A GST assessment confirming a proposed demand was set aside where the adjudication was non-reasoned and did not meaningfully deal with the assessee's reply. Although the reply had been received and acknowledged, the order merely said it was not in order and that records were not produced, without a proper discussion of the objections; the assessment was quashed and remitted for fresh decision on merits. The text also notes that calling the assessee for personal hearing before requiring a reply was procedurally improper, and due notice and proper process were directed before any final order.
A GST assessment confirming a proposed demand was set aside where the adjudication was non-reasoned and did not meaningfully deal with the assessee's reply. Although the reply had been received and acknowledged, the order merely said it was not in order and that records were not produced, without a proper discussion of the objections; the assessment was quashed and remitted for fresh decision on merits. The text also notes that calling the assessee for personal hearing before requiring a reply was procedurally improper, and due notice and proper process were directed before any final order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.