Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
ITAT held that Rule 10CA is only a computational mechanism and does not cure functional dissimilarity, scale differences or segmental deficiencies; it therefore directed exclusion of Nihilent Technologies, Tata Elxsi, Cybage Software, Infosys, Larsen & Toubro Infotech and Wipro from the comparables set. It also held that a different financial year by itself does not vitiate comparability where public-domain data can be suitably extrapolated, and directed inclusion of R Systems International on relevant-year data. The Tribunal allowed working capital adjustment based on opening and closing balances from annual reports, and held that any separate receivables adjustment must be tested after such adjustment; if still required, interest should be benchmarked at LIBOR plus 200 basis points with a 60-day credit period.
ITAT held that Rule 10CA is only a computational mechanism and does not cure functional dissimilarity, scale differences or segmental deficiencies; it therefore directed exclusion of Nihilent Technologies, Tata Elxsi, Cybage Software, Infosys, Larsen & Toubro Infotech and Wipro from the comparables set. It also held that a different financial year by itself does not vitiate comparability where public-domain data can be suitably extrapolated, and directed inclusion of R Systems International on relevant-year data. The Tribunal allowed working capital adjustment based on opening and closing balances from annual reports, and held that any separate receivables adjustment must be tested after such adjustment; if still required, interest should be benchmarked at LIBOR plus 200 basis points with a 60-day credit period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
