Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Substantial Government financing under section 10(23C)(iiiab) is tested with reference to Government grants received during the relevant previous year, as prescribed by the Explanation and Rule 2BBB, and not by cumulative grants from earlier years. The provision requires those grants to exceed 50% of total receipts, including voluntary contributions, for that year. Because the assessee's Government grants fell below that threshold in each relevant year, the statutory condition for exemption was not met. The educational-purpose condition was not in dispute, but exemption was still denied and the denial was upheld.
Substantial Government financing under section 10(23C)(iiiab) is tested with reference to Government grants received during the relevant previous year, as prescribed by the Explanation and Rule 2BBB, and not by cumulative grants from earlier years. The provision requires those grants to exceed 50% of total receipts, including voluntary contributions, for that year. Because the assessee's Government grants fell below that threshold in each relevant year, the statutory condition for exemption was not met. The educational-purpose condition was not in dispute, but exemption was still denied and the denial was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
