Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Substantial Government financing under section 10(23C)(iiiab) is tested with reference to Government grants received during the relevant previous year, as prescribed by the Explanation and Rule 2BBB, and not by cumulative grants from earlier years. The provision requires those grants to exceed 50% of total receipts, including voluntary contributions, for that year. Because the assessee's Government grants fell below that threshold in each relevant year, the statutory condition for exemption was not met. The educational-purpose condition was not in dispute, but exemption was still denied and the denial was upheld.
Substantial Government financing under section 10(23C)(iiiab) is tested with reference to Government grants received during the relevant previous year, as prescribed by the Explanation and Rule 2BBB, and not by cumulative grants from earlier years. The provision requires those grants to exceed 50% of total receipts, including voluntary contributions, for that year. Because the assessee's Government grants fell below that threshold in each relevant year, the statutory condition for exemption was not met. The educational-purpose condition was not in dispute, but exemption was still denied and the denial was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
