Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Interest income under the mercantile system was held taxable in AY 2007-08 on accrual basis because the assessee, having followed that method, had to bring the entire accrued amount to tax in that year and produced no corroborative material showing that accrual had been deferred by litigation or other valid reason. The Tribunal also upheld reopening under section 147, holding that the original assessment had not examined the balance accrued interest and that information from remand proceedings constituted tangible material; the plea of mere change of opinion therefore failed. To avoid double taxation, it approved verification and rectification in AY 2009-10 if the amount had been declared there.
Interest income under the mercantile system was held taxable in AY 2007-08 on accrual basis because the assessee, having followed that method, had to bring the entire accrued amount to tax in that year and produced no corroborative material showing that accrual had been deferred by litigation or other valid reason. The Tribunal also upheld reopening under section 147, holding that the original assessment had not examined the balance accrued interest and that information from remand proceedings constituted tangible material; the plea of mere change of opinion therefore failed. To avoid double taxation, it approved verification and rectification in AY 2009-10 if the amount had been declared there.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.