Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Third-party seized documents cannot, by themselves, sustain an addition where the assessee denies receipt of cash and no independent corroboration such as a cash trail or confirmation is produced; the ITAT held that the presumption under section 132(4A) read with section 292C does not operate against an assessee for material found at a third party's premises, so the addition failed. A receipt linked to a joint development agreement could not be taxed as income from other sources under section 56 without first examining whether it arose from a transfer of a capital asset and the correct year of taxability under the capital gains provisions; as the required transfer analysis was not undertaken, the addition was deleted.
Third-party seized documents cannot, by themselves, sustain an addition where the assessee denies receipt of cash and no independent corroboration such as a cash trail or confirmation is produced; the ITAT held that the presumption under section 132(4A) read with section 292C does not operate against an assessee for material found at a third party's premises, so the addition failed. A receipt linked to a joint development agreement could not be taxed as income from other sources under section 56 without first examining whether it arose from a transfer of a capital asset and the correct year of taxability under the capital gains provisions; as the required transfer analysis was not undertaken, the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.