Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Third-party seized documents cannot, by themselves, sustain an addition where the assessee denies receipt of cash and no independent corroboration such as a cash trail or confirmation is produced; the ITAT held that the presumption under section 132(4A) read with section 292C does not operate against an assessee for material found at a third party's premises, so the addition failed. A receipt linked to a joint development agreement could not be taxed as income from other sources under section 56 without first examining whether it arose from a transfer of a capital asset and the correct year of taxability under the capital gains provisions; as the required transfer analysis was not undertaken, the addition was deleted.
Third-party seized documents cannot, by themselves, sustain an addition where the assessee denies receipt of cash and no independent corroboration such as a cash trail or confirmation is produced; the ITAT held that the presumption under section 132(4A) read with section 292C does not operate against an assessee for material found at a third party's premises, so the addition failed. A receipt linked to a joint development agreement could not be taxed as income from other sources under section 56 without first examining whether it arose from a transfer of a capital asset and the correct year of taxability under the capital gains provisions; as the required transfer analysis was not undertaken, the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
