Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Government salary grant received by a charitable trust under a binding condition for use only in salary payments was treated as a tied-up receipt and excluded from the income base for accumulation under section 11(1)(a). The Tribunal held that accumulation is available only in respect of income held under trust that is at the assessee's disposal and capable of being applied or set apart at its discretion; here, the trust acted merely as a conduit without dominion or beneficial control. The Bombay HC ruling in CIT v. Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council was distinguished because it concerned characterisation of grants as income, not their inclusion in the accumulation base.
Government salary grant received by a charitable trust under a binding condition for use only in salary payments was treated as a tied-up receipt and excluded from the income base for accumulation under section 11(1)(a). The Tribunal held that accumulation is available only in respect of income held under trust that is at the assessee's disposal and capable of being applied or set apart at its discretion; here, the trust acted merely as a conduit without dominion or beneficial control. The Bombay HC ruling in CIT v. Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council was distinguished because it concerned characterisation of grants as income, not their inclusion in the accumulation base.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
