Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Government salary grant received by a charitable trust under a binding condition for use only in salary payments was treated as a tied-up receipt and excluded from the income base for accumulation under section 11(1)(a). The Tribunal held that accumulation is available only in respect of income held under trust that is at the assessee's disposal and capable of being applied or set apart at its discretion; here, the trust acted merely as a conduit without dominion or beneficial control. The Bombay HC ruling in CIT v. Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council was distinguished because it concerned characterisation of grants as income, not their inclusion in the accumulation base.
Government salary grant received by a charitable trust under a binding condition for use only in salary payments was treated as a tied-up receipt and excluded from the income base for accumulation under section 11(1)(a). The Tribunal held that accumulation is available only in respect of income held under trust that is at the assessee's disposal and capable of being applied or set apart at its discretion; here, the trust acted merely as a conduit without dominion or beneficial control. The Bombay HC ruling in CIT v. Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council was distinguished because it concerned characterisation of grants as income, not their inclusion in the accumulation base.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
