Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
ITAT set aside the disallowance of agricultural income exemption for AY 2016-17 after finding that supporting bills and invoices had been filed but not considered, while land ownership and agricultural use evidence remained incomplete; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication with opportunity to file further material. The deletion of the addition under section 69 for unexplained investment in immovable properties was also vacated because the appellate relief had been based on additional evidence not properly dealt with, and the applicability of section 69 was left open for the Assessing Officer. For AY 2020-21, the denial of agricultural income exemption was remanded because relied-upon adverse material was not clearly confronted to the assessee, requiring fresh decision after hearing.
ITAT set aside the disallowance of agricultural income exemption for AY 2016-17 after finding that supporting bills and invoices had been filed but not considered, while land ownership and agricultural use evidence remained incomplete; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication with opportunity to file further material. The deletion of the addition under section 69 for unexplained investment in immovable properties was also vacated because the appellate relief had been based on additional evidence not properly dealt with, and the applicability of section 69 was left open for the Assessing Officer. For AY 2020-21, the denial of agricultural income exemption was remanded because relied-upon adverse material was not clearly confronted to the assessee, requiring fresh decision after hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
