Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
The HC followed its earlier decision in an identical matter and held that delay in filing the statutory appeal could be condoned where the appellate authority had no power to condone delay and the writ remedy was pursued bona fide. The writ petition was allowed on the same terms as in Shobhalal, the original and appellate orders were quashed, and the appellate authority was directed to hear and decide the already filed appeal on merits in accordance with law, subject to compliance with the statutory deposit and other dues directed by the Court.
The HC followed its earlier decision in an identical matter and held that delay in filing the statutory appeal could be condoned where the appellate authority had no power to condone delay and the writ remedy was pursued bona fide. The writ petition was allowed on the same terms as in Shobhalal, the original and appellate orders were quashed, and the appellate authority was directed to hear and decide the already filed appeal on merits in accordance with law, subject to compliance with the statutory deposit and other dues directed by the Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.