Infrastructure facility: energy-efficient public lighting held integral to road projects, qualifying the operator as a developer and eligible for dedu...
Fourth Proviso to Section 153A: extended-period inquiry requires a reasonable, material-based satisfaction that escaped income likely exceeds the thre...
A writ petition challenging an adjudication order was not examined on merits because an efficacious statutory appeal was available and the limitation period for filing that appeal was still running. The HC sustained the preliminary objection, held that the petitioner's grounds could be tested before the appellate authority, and disposed of the petition without expressing any view on the merits. All issues were left open for consideration in appeal, and the petitioner was permitted to pursue the statutory appellate remedy within the time granted.
A writ petition challenging an adjudication order was not examined on merits because an efficacious statutory appeal was available and the limitation period for filing that appeal was still running. The HC sustained the preliminary objection, held that the petitioner's grounds could be tested before the appellate authority, and disposed of the petition without expressing any view on the merits. All issues were left open for consideration in appeal, and the petitioner was permitted to pursue the statutory appellate remedy within the time granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
