Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the registered owner's access to the statutory remedy in detention and seizure proceedings and held that the relevant MOV forms, along with the temporary ID and password, should be furnished to the petitioner on the e-mail address stated in MOV-09. It noted that, although the forms had been prepared in the name of the driver or person in charge, the right of appeal vested in the owner of the goods. The petitioner was therefore permitted to pursue the statutory remedy, with limitation computed from compliance with the direction and no objection as to limitation to be raised.
The High Court addressed the registered owner's access to the statutory remedy in detention and seizure proceedings and held that the relevant MOV forms, along with the temporary ID and password, should be furnished to the petitioner on the e-mail address stated in MOV-09. It noted that, although the forms had been prepared in the name of the driver or person in charge, the right of appeal vested in the owner of the goods. The petitioner was therefore permitted to pursue the statutory remedy, with limitation computed from compliance with the direction and no objection as to limitation to be raised.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.