Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The High Court addressed the registered owner's access to the statutory remedy in detention and seizure proceedings and held that the relevant MOV forms, along with the temporary ID and password, should be furnished to the petitioner on the e-mail address stated in MOV-09. It noted that, although the forms had been prepared in the name of the driver or person in charge, the right of appeal vested in the owner of the goods. The petitioner was therefore permitted to pursue the statutory remedy, with limitation computed from compliance with the direction and no objection as to limitation to be raised.
The High Court addressed the registered owner's access to the statutory remedy in detention and seizure proceedings and held that the relevant MOV forms, along with the temporary ID and password, should be furnished to the petitioner on the e-mail address stated in MOV-09. It noted that, although the forms had been prepared in the name of the driver or person in charge, the right of appeal vested in the owner of the goods. The petitioner was therefore permitted to pursue the statutory remedy, with limitation computed from compliance with the direction and no objection as to limitation to be raised.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.