Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Provision for repair of unserviceable spare parts in an airline business was treated as an allowable business expenditure rather than a mere contingent liability, because the Tribunal found the inventory and repair outgo to be part of the ordinary recurring business cycle and accepted estimation-based provisioning under Bharat Earth Movers and Chainrup Sampatram. The disallowance was deleted, subject to proper computation in accordance with law. The claim for provision for obsolescence of Bid & Win inventory was rejected for the year under appeal, as the Department stated it had been accepted in the succeeding assessment year. Other disallowance grounds were not pressed before the CIT(A).
Provision for repair of unserviceable spare parts in an airline business was treated as an allowable business expenditure rather than a mere contingent liability, because the Tribunal found the inventory and repair outgo to be part of the ordinary recurring business cycle and accepted estimation-based provisioning under Bharat Earth Movers and Chainrup Sampatram. The disallowance was deleted, subject to proper computation in accordance with law. The claim for provision for obsolescence of Bid & Win inventory was rejected for the year under appeal, as the Department stated it had been accepted in the succeeding assessment year. Other disallowance grounds were not pressed before the CIT(A).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.