Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Provision for repair of unserviceable spare parts in an airline business was treated as an allowable business expenditure rather than a mere contingent liability, because the Tribunal found the inventory and repair outgo to be part of the ordinary recurring business cycle and accepted estimation-based provisioning under Bharat Earth Movers and Chainrup Sampatram. The disallowance was deleted, subject to proper computation in accordance with law. The claim for provision for obsolescence of Bid & Win inventory was rejected for the year under appeal, as the Department stated it had been accepted in the succeeding assessment year. Other disallowance grounds were not pressed before the CIT(A).
Provision for repair of unserviceable spare parts in an airline business was treated as an allowable business expenditure rather than a mere contingent liability, because the Tribunal found the inventory and repair outgo to be part of the ordinary recurring business cycle and accepted estimation-based provisioning under Bharat Earth Movers and Chainrup Sampatram. The disallowance was deleted, subject to proper computation in accordance with law. The claim for provision for obsolescence of Bid & Win inventory was rejected for the year under appeal, as the Department stated it had been accepted in the succeeding assessment year. Other disallowance grounds were not pressed before the CIT(A).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.