Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
A registered educational trust could not have its expenditure claim rejected solely because Form 10B was filed late and the expenditure details were not reflected in the return. The ITAT treated the lapse as procedural, held that such requirements should advance justice rather than defeat a lawful claim, and accepted that the belated audit report could be taken into account. It directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the claim after taking Form 10B on record and after giving due opportunity in accordance with natural justice. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication.
A registered educational trust could not have its expenditure claim rejected solely because Form 10B was filed late and the expenditure details were not reflected in the return. The ITAT treated the lapse as procedural, held that such requirements should advance justice rather than defeat a lawful claim, and accepted that the belated audit report could be taken into account. It directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the claim after taking Form 10B on record and after giving due opportunity in accordance with natural justice. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.