Belated Form 10B filing during Covid-19 cannot defeat charitable exemption where genuine hardship warrants condonation and substantial justice prevail...
Limitation for consequential assessments runs from prescribed authority receipt, while verified purchases cannot be disallowed merely for unanswered s...
Higher depreciation for qualifying commercial vehicles, exempt-income disallowance, research deduction verification, and club-expense treatment clarif...
Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that salary paid by a charitable trust to its Chairperson was not excessive where the Department had accepted similar remuneration in earlier and later years, so the disallowance under section 13(2)(c) was deleted. It also found that repairs to rented premises used by the trust were commercially expedient and that no personal benefit to a specified person had been shown, so that addition was deleted as well. On the separate appellate issue, the Tribunal held that the CIT(A) had failed to consider the assessee's written submissions, additional evidence and Rule 46A application, amounting to a natural justice defect, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after reasonable opportunity.
The ITAT held that salary paid by a charitable trust to its Chairperson was not excessive where the Department had accepted similar remuneration in earlier and later years, so the disallowance under section 13(2)(c) was deleted. It also found that repairs to rented premises used by the trust were commercially expedient and that no personal benefit to a specified person had been shown, so that addition was deleted as well. On the separate appellate issue, the Tribunal held that the CIT(A) had failed to consider the assessee's written submissions, additional evidence and Rule 46A application, amounting to a natural justice defect, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after reasonable opportunity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.