Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The ITAT held that salary paid by a charitable trust to its Chairperson was not excessive where the Department had accepted similar remuneration in earlier and later years, so the disallowance under section 13(2)(c) was deleted. It also found that repairs to rented premises used by the trust were commercially expedient and that no personal benefit to a specified person had been shown, so that addition was deleted as well. On the separate appellate issue, the Tribunal held that the CIT(A) had failed to consider the assessee's written submissions, additional evidence and Rule 46A application, amounting to a natural justice defect, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after reasonable opportunity.
The ITAT held that salary paid by a charitable trust to its Chairperson was not excessive where the Department had accepted similar remuneration in earlier and later years, so the disallowance under section 13(2)(c) was deleted. It also found that repairs to rented premises used by the trust were commercially expedient and that no personal benefit to a specified person had been shown, so that addition was deleted as well. On the separate appellate issue, the Tribunal held that the CIT(A) had failed to consider the assessee's written submissions, additional evidence and Rule 46A application, amounting to a natural justice defect, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after reasonable opportunity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.