Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
The ITAT held that unsecured loan amounts received in A.Y. 2020-21 could not be added again under section 68 because the same sums were later forfeited and offered to tax as other income in A.Y. 2023-24. On the factual record, the assessee's computation of income, profit and loss account, and breakup of other income showed that the forfeited loan amounts from the two creditors had already been subjected to tax. Taxing them once more in the year of receipt would create double taxation, so the addition was unsustainable and was deleted.
The ITAT held that unsecured loan amounts received in A.Y. 2020-21 could not be added again under section 68 because the same sums were later forfeited and offered to tax as other income in A.Y. 2023-24. On the factual record, the assessee's computation of income, profit and loss account, and breakup of other income showed that the forfeited loan amounts from the two creditors had already been subjected to tax. Taxing them once more in the year of receipt would create double taxation, so the addition was unsustainable and was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
