Statutory transfer formalities invalidated alleged share and property transfers, while retrospective record manipulation constituted oppression and mi...
Provisional attachment of laundered funds and equivalent-value property sustained, with statutory protection limited to pension, gratuity and providen...
Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings...
Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Invocation of a continuing guarantee by demand was treated as the point when liability became enforceable, so the Section 95 insolvency application against the personal guarantor was held to be within limitation because the demand notice preceded the filing date. The creditor's debt and default were found sufficiently established through the guarantee and acknowledgment, audited balance sheets showing borrowings, and admission of the claim in liquidation proceedings; discrepancies in the amounts stated across proceedings did not defeat admission at that stage. Allegations of conflict of interest against the resolution professional were not accepted as a ground to interfere with the admission order, though the merits of that allegation were left open. The appeal was dismissed.
Invocation of a continuing guarantee by demand was treated as the point when liability became enforceable, so the Section 95 insolvency application against the personal guarantor was held to be within limitation because the demand notice preceded the filing date. The creditor's debt and default were found sufficiently established through the guarantee and acknowledgment, audited balance sheets showing borrowings, and admission of the claim in liquidation proceedings; discrepancies in the amounts stated across proceedings did not defeat admission at that stage. Allegations of conflict of interest against the resolution professional were not accepted as a ground to interfere with the admission order, though the merits of that allegation were left open. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
