Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer of MHADA-reserved flats after the occupancy certificate was held taxable as works contract service, not a GST-exempt sale of immovable property. The post-completion exclusion did not apply because the applicant had undertaken a binding pre-approval obligation to construct and transfer the earmarked flats, and received additional FSI as non-monetary consideration in return. Since GST consideration includes non-cash benefits, the supply was not wholly post-occupancy and remained within Schedule II. For valuation, the Authority held that the price paid by MHADA allottees was not the sole consideration and that the MHADA-administered rate was not open market value. GST value had to be based on comparable flats sold to non-MHADA buyers in the same project.
Transfer of MHADA-reserved flats after the occupancy certificate was held taxable as works contract service, not a GST-exempt sale of immovable property. The post-completion exclusion did not apply because the applicant had undertaken a binding pre-approval obligation to construct and transfer the earmarked flats, and received additional FSI as non-monetary consideration in return. Since GST consideration includes non-cash benefits, the supply was not wholly post-occupancy and remained within Schedule II. For valuation, the Authority held that the price paid by MHADA allottees was not the sole consideration and that the MHADA-administered rate was not open market value. GST value had to be based on comparable flats sold to non-MHADA buyers in the same project.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.