CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Charitable registration turns on predominant purpose and genuine activities, while incidental fees and related-party rent require supporting adverse m...
MAT book-profit adjustments exclude disallowances for exempt-income expenditure and demerger expenditure unless expressly listed under the statutory c...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Low household withdrawals were treated as unjustified where the assessee showed substantially lower withdrawals than in the preceding year and produced no evidence that the spouse met household expenses, so the Revenue's estimation was upheld. Year-end trade and expense creditors were not assessable as unexplained cash credits under section 68 because the assessment accepted the transaction credits but rejected only the unpaid balances without reason, and the outstanding amounts were later paid through banking channels. Freight expenditure was disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) because tax had not been deducted at source and the transporters' declarations under section 194C(6) were incomplete and appeared afterthoughts, so the disallowance was sustained.
Low household withdrawals were treated as unjustified where the assessee showed substantially lower withdrawals than in the preceding year and produced no evidence that the spouse met household expenses, so the Revenue's estimation was upheld. Year-end trade and expense creditors were not assessable as unexplained cash credits under section 68 because the assessment accepted the transaction credits but rejected only the unpaid balances without reason, and the outstanding amounts were later paid through banking channels. Freight expenditure was disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) because tax had not been deducted at source and the transporters' declarations under section 194C(6) were incomplete and appeared afterthoughts, so the disallowance was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
