Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
A related-party slump sale capital loss was disallowed because the assessee failed to prove genuineness, valuation basis and fair consideration through independent material, and the claimed loss was not supported beyond book entries. Compensation received on the departure of a key medical professional was taxed as revenue receipt because the hospital's profit-earning apparatus remained intact and the payment was linked to anticipated business loss rather than destruction of a capital source. The Tribunal also upheld deletion of interest disallowance and interest capitalisation additions on the footing that the assessee had sufficient own funds. Section 14A was held inapplicable because no exempt income was earned during the year.
A related-party slump sale capital loss was disallowed because the assessee failed to prove genuineness, valuation basis and fair consideration through independent material, and the claimed loss was not supported beyond book entries. Compensation received on the departure of a key medical professional was taxed as revenue receipt because the hospital's profit-earning apparatus remained intact and the payment was linked to anticipated business loss rather than destruction of a capital source. The Tribunal also upheld deletion of interest disallowance and interest capitalisation additions on the footing that the assessee had sufficient own funds. Section 14A was held inapplicable because no exempt income was earned during the year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.