Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
ITAT held that where interest on unsecured loans was genuinely incurred for business purposes, the dispute could be confined only to the year of allowability under the mercantile system. As no finding was recorded that the interest was bogus, non-business, or lacking bona fides, disallowance of the portion claimed in the relevant year could not be sustained merely because it might be deductible in the next year. Shifting the deduction period was treated as revenue neutral, and the addition for alleged excess interest expenditure was deleted.
ITAT held that where interest on unsecured loans was genuinely incurred for business purposes, the dispute could be confined only to the year of allowability under the mercantile system. As no finding was recorded that the interest was bogus, non-business, or lacking bona fides, disallowance of the portion claimed in the relevant year could not be sustained merely because it might be deductible in the next year. Shifting the deduction period was treated as revenue neutral, and the addition for alleged excess interest expenditure was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
