Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Provisional attachment of the motor vehicle was confirmed because the money trail linked its purchase to compensation arising from land earlier acquired in the name of the benamidar with funds provided by the alleged beneficial owner. The Tribunal relied on the admitted employment relationship, the benamidar's sworn admission that the land had been purchased in his name by the beneficial owner, the absence of any proved independent source of funds, and recovery of the vehicle registration document from the beneficial owner. On these facts, the claim that the vehicle was bought from the benamidar's own funds was rejected, and the challenge to its benami character failed.
Provisional attachment of the motor vehicle was confirmed because the money trail linked its purchase to compensation arising from land earlier acquired in the name of the benamidar with funds provided by the alleged beneficial owner. The Tribunal relied on the admitted employment relationship, the benamidar's sworn admission that the land had been purchased in his name by the beneficial owner, the absence of any proved independent source of funds, and recovery of the vehicle registration document from the beneficial owner. On these facts, the claim that the vehicle was bought from the benamidar's own funds was rejected, and the challenge to its benami character failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.