Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Provisional attachment of the motor vehicle was confirmed because the money trail linked its purchase to compensation arising from land earlier acquired in the name of the benamidar with funds provided by the alleged beneficial owner. The Tribunal relied on the admitted employment relationship, the benamidar's sworn admission that the land had been purchased in his name by the beneficial owner, the absence of any proved independent source of funds, and recovery of the vehicle registration document from the beneficial owner. On these facts, the claim that the vehicle was bought from the benamidar's own funds was rejected, and the challenge to its benami character failed.
Provisional attachment of the motor vehicle was confirmed because the money trail linked its purchase to compensation arising from land earlier acquired in the name of the benamidar with funds provided by the alleged beneficial owner. The Tribunal relied on the admitted employment relationship, the benamidar's sworn admission that the land had been purchased in his name by the beneficial owner, the absence of any proved independent source of funds, and recovery of the vehicle registration document from the beneficial owner. On these facts, the claim that the vehicle was bought from the benamidar's own funds was rejected, and the challenge to its benami character failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.