Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC granted bail in a GST prosecution alleging wrongful availment and passing on of input tax credit through transactions linked to a non-existent firm. The Court noted that no notice under Section 74 of the GST Act had been issued to the applicant's firm, no cancellation proceedings had been taken against its registration, and the supplier's registration was cancelled only after the relevant transactions. As the record then consisted of tax invoices, e-way bills and freight bills, and there were no criminal antecedents, the Court applied the principle that offences resting on documentary evidence ordinarily justify bail in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, and ordered release on conditions.
HC granted bail in a GST prosecution alleging wrongful availment and passing on of input tax credit through transactions linked to a non-existent firm. The Court noted that no notice under Section 74 of the GST Act had been issued to the applicant's firm, no cancellation proceedings had been taken against its registration, and the supplier's registration was cancelled only after the relevant transactions. As the record then consisted of tax invoices, e-way bills and freight bills, and there were no criminal antecedents, the Court applied the principle that offences resting on documentary evidence ordinarily justify bail in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, and ordered release on conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.