Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act saved input tax credit claims for the specified financial years when returns were filed up to 30.11.2021, notwithstanding the limitation in Section 16(4). The High Court followed its earlier common order and quashed the impugned reversal to the extent it denied ITC solely on limitation, making that coercive action unsustainable on that ground alone. The Department's liberty was preserved to proceed in accordance with law on separate issues such as discrepancy, wrong availment, excess claim, or fake ITC, if any.
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act saved input tax credit claims for the specified financial years when returns were filed up to 30.11.2021, notwithstanding the limitation in Section 16(4). The High Court followed its earlier common order and quashed the impugned reversal to the extent it denied ITC solely on limitation, making that coercive action unsustainable on that ground alone. The Department's liberty was preserved to proceed in accordance with law on separate issues such as discrepancy, wrong availment, excess claim, or fake ITC, if any.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
