Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act saved input tax credit claims for the specified financial years when returns were filed up to 30.11.2021, notwithstanding the limitation in Section 16(4). The High Court followed its earlier common order and quashed the impugned reversal to the extent it denied ITC solely on limitation, making that coercive action unsustainable on that ground alone. The Department's liberty was preserved to proceed in accordance with law on separate issues such as discrepancy, wrong availment, excess claim, or fake ITC, if any.
Retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act saved input tax credit claims for the specified financial years when returns were filed up to 30.11.2021, notwithstanding the limitation in Section 16(4). The High Court followed its earlier common order and quashed the impugned reversal to the extent it denied ITC solely on limitation, making that coercive action unsustainable on that ground alone. The Department's liberty was preserved to proceed in accordance with law on separate issues such as discrepancy, wrong availment, excess claim, or fake ITC, if any.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
