Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Interest received on enhanced compensation was held taxable under the head "Income from Other Sources" after the post-2009 statutory scheme, with only the prescribed 50% deduction available; the claim for exemption under section 10(37) was rejected. The Tribunal followed its earlier coordinate-bench ruling and treated the amended provisions as governing the tax treatment of interest on compensation. The assessee's challenge to the reassessment, based on non-supply of recorded reasons and absence of a transfer intimation under the faceless procedure, also failed because participation in the proceedings showed no demonstrated prejudice and no incurable jurisdictional defect was established. The assessment was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
Interest received on enhanced compensation was held taxable under the head "Income from Other Sources" after the post-2009 statutory scheme, with only the prescribed 50% deduction available; the claim for exemption under section 10(37) was rejected. The Tribunal followed its earlier coordinate-bench ruling and treated the amended provisions as governing the tax treatment of interest on compensation. The assessee's challenge to the reassessment, based on non-supply of recorded reasons and absence of a transfer intimation under the faceless procedure, also failed because participation in the proceedings showed no demonstrated prejudice and no incurable jurisdictional defect was established. The assessment was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
