Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Interest received on enhanced compensation was held taxable under the head "Income from Other Sources" after the post-2009 statutory scheme, with only the prescribed 50% deduction available; the claim for exemption under section 10(37) was rejected. The Tribunal followed its earlier coordinate-bench ruling and treated the amended provisions as governing the tax treatment of interest on compensation. The assessee's challenge to the reassessment, based on non-supply of recorded reasons and absence of a transfer intimation under the faceless procedure, also failed because participation in the proceedings showed no demonstrated prejudice and no incurable jurisdictional defect was established. The assessment was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
Interest received on enhanced compensation was held taxable under the head "Income from Other Sources" after the post-2009 statutory scheme, with only the prescribed 50% deduction available; the claim for exemption under section 10(37) was rejected. The Tribunal followed its earlier coordinate-bench ruling and treated the amended provisions as governing the tax treatment of interest on compensation. The assessee's challenge to the reassessment, based on non-supply of recorded reasons and absence of a transfer intimation under the faceless procedure, also failed because participation in the proceedings showed no demonstrated prejudice and no incurable jurisdictional defect was established. The assessment was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.