Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Interest received on enhanced compensation was held taxable under the head "Income from Other Sources" after the post-2009 statutory scheme, with only the prescribed 50% deduction available; the claim for exemption under section 10(37) was rejected. The Tribunal followed its earlier coordinate-bench ruling and treated the amended provisions as governing the tax treatment of interest on compensation. The assessee's challenge to the reassessment, based on non-supply of recorded reasons and absence of a transfer intimation under the faceless procedure, also failed because participation in the proceedings showed no demonstrated prejudice and no incurable jurisdictional defect was established. The assessment was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
Interest received on enhanced compensation was held taxable under the head "Income from Other Sources" after the post-2009 statutory scheme, with only the prescribed 50% deduction available; the claim for exemption under section 10(37) was rejected. The Tribunal followed its earlier coordinate-bench ruling and treated the amended provisions as governing the tax treatment of interest on compensation. The assessee's challenge to the reassessment, based on non-supply of recorded reasons and absence of a transfer intimation under the faceless procedure, also failed because participation in the proceedings showed no demonstrated prejudice and no incurable jurisdictional defect was established. The assessment was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.