Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Revision under section 263 cannot be sustained on grounds not set out in the show cause notice, and the Principal Commissioner cannot introduce a fresh allegation of non-verification of expenses at the revision stage without confronting the assessee. The article also explains that a transfer of an outstanding loan balance by journal entry under a tripartite arrangement is not an actual repayment of loan, so the alleged breach of section 269T and penalty under section 271E did not arise. Where the Assessing Officer had already made enquiries and recorded the assessee's explanation, revision could not rest on a mere view that the enquiry was inadequate. In the absence of a demonstrated error causing prejudice to the Revenue, section 263 was held inapplicable.
Revision under section 263 cannot be sustained on grounds not set out in the show cause notice, and the Principal Commissioner cannot introduce a fresh allegation of non-verification of expenses at the revision stage without confronting the assessee. The article also explains that a transfer of an outstanding loan balance by journal entry under a tripartite arrangement is not an actual repayment of loan, so the alleged breach of section 269T and penalty under section 271E did not arise. Where the Assessing Officer had already made enquiries and recorded the assessee's explanation, revision could not rest on a mere view that the enquiry was inadequate. In the absence of a demonstrated error causing prejudice to the Revenue, section 263 was held inapplicable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
