Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision under section 263 cannot be sustained on grounds not set out in the show cause notice, and the Principal Commissioner cannot introduce a fresh allegation of non-verification of expenses at the revision stage without confronting the assessee. The article also explains that a transfer of an outstanding loan balance by journal entry under a tripartite arrangement is not an actual repayment of loan, so the alleged breach of section 269T and penalty under section 271E did not arise. Where the Assessing Officer had already made enquiries and recorded the assessee's explanation, revision could not rest on a mere view that the enquiry was inadequate. In the absence of a demonstrated error causing prejudice to the Revenue, section 263 was held inapplicable.
Revision under section 263 cannot be sustained on grounds not set out in the show cause notice, and the Principal Commissioner cannot introduce a fresh allegation of non-verification of expenses at the revision stage without confronting the assessee. The article also explains that a transfer of an outstanding loan balance by journal entry under a tripartite arrangement is not an actual repayment of loan, so the alleged breach of section 269T and penalty under section 271E did not arise. Where the Assessing Officer had already made enquiries and recorded the assessee's explanation, revision could not rest on a mere view that the enquiry was inadequate. In the absence of a demonstrated error causing prejudice to the Revenue, section 263 was held inapplicable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
