Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Revision under section 263 cannot be sustained on grounds not set out in the show cause notice, and the Principal Commissioner cannot introduce a fresh allegation of non-verification of expenses at the revision stage without confronting the assessee. The article also explains that a transfer of an outstanding loan balance by journal entry under a tripartite arrangement is not an actual repayment of loan, so the alleged breach of section 269T and penalty under section 271E did not arise. Where the Assessing Officer had already made enquiries and recorded the assessee's explanation, revision could not rest on a mere view that the enquiry was inadequate. In the absence of a demonstrated error causing prejudice to the Revenue, section 263 was held inapplicable.
Revision under section 263 cannot be sustained on grounds not set out in the show cause notice, and the Principal Commissioner cannot introduce a fresh allegation of non-verification of expenses at the revision stage without confronting the assessee. The article also explains that a transfer of an outstanding loan balance by journal entry under a tripartite arrangement is not an actual repayment of loan, so the alleged breach of section 269T and penalty under section 271E did not arise. Where the Assessing Officer had already made enquiries and recorded the assessee's explanation, revision could not rest on a mere view that the enquiry was inadequate. In the absence of a demonstrated error causing prejudice to the Revenue, section 263 was held inapplicable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
