Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Proper service of notice will not vitiate an appellate order unless actual prejudice is shown, and the Tribunal found no such prejudice where notices were issued through the ITBA system and multiple opportunities were granted. Rejection of books of account under section 145(3) was upheld because salary es lacked primary records, creditors remained unverified, stock discrepancies were found, and complete supporting evidence was not produced. Once the books were rejected, income estimation followed, and the Tribunal sustained the net profit rate adopted on the basis of past history, industry practice and the defects in the accounts, rejecting the challenge as unsupported.
Proper service of notice will not vitiate an appellate order unless actual prejudice is shown, and the Tribunal found no such prejudice where notices were issued through the ITBA system and multiple opportunities were granted. Rejection of books of account under section 145(3) was upheld because salary es lacked primary records, creditors remained unverified, stock discrepancies were found, and complete supporting evidence was not produced. Once the books were rejected, income estimation followed, and the Tribunal sustained the net profit rate adopted on the basis of past history, industry practice and the defects in the accounts, rejecting the challenge as unsupported.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.