Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Proper service of notice will not vitiate an appellate order unless actual prejudice is shown, and the Tribunal found no such prejudice where notices were issued through the ITBA system and multiple opportunities were granted. Rejection of books of account under section 145(3) was upheld because salary es lacked primary records, creditors remained unverified, stock discrepancies were found, and complete supporting evidence was not produced. Once the books were rejected, income estimation followed, and the Tribunal sustained the net profit rate adopted on the basis of past history, industry practice and the defects in the accounts, rejecting the challenge as unsupported.
Proper service of notice will not vitiate an appellate order unless actual prejudice is shown, and the Tribunal found no such prejudice where notices were issued through the ITBA system and multiple opportunities were granted. Rejection of books of account under section 145(3) was upheld because salary es lacked primary records, creditors remained unverified, stock discrepancies were found, and complete supporting evidence was not produced. Once the books were rejected, income estimation followed, and the Tribunal sustained the net profit rate adopted on the basis of past history, industry practice and the defects in the accounts, rejecting the challenge as unsupported.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.