Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
The Appellate Tribunal stated that its earlier common final order directing release of the attached properties and refund of the detained amount had already been upheld in challenge, and on that basis the appellants were entitled to possession of the properties. It further held that an order under the PMLA is executable as a civil court decree and may be transmitted under section 35(4) to the civil court having local jurisdiction for execution. As the properties were situated within the jurisdiction of the District and Sessions Court, Raigad-Alibag, the Tribunal directed transmission of the order and original record to that court for execution, while keeping the remaining execution issues pending.
The Appellate Tribunal stated that its earlier common final order directing release of the attached properties and refund of the detained amount had already been upheld in challenge, and on that basis the appellants were entitled to possession of the properties. It further held that an order under the PMLA is executable as a civil court decree and may be transmitted under section 35(4) to the civil court having local jurisdiction for execution. As the properties were situated within the jurisdiction of the District and Sessions Court, Raigad-Alibag, the Tribunal directed transmission of the order and original record to that court for execution, while keeping the remaining execution issues pending.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.