Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The Appellate Tribunal stated that its earlier common final order directing release of the attached properties and refund of the detained amount had already been upheld in challenge, and on that basis the appellants were entitled to possession of the properties. It further held that an order under the PMLA is executable as a civil court decree and may be transmitted under section 35(4) to the civil court having local jurisdiction for execution. As the properties were situated within the jurisdiction of the District and Sessions Court, Raigad-Alibag, the Tribunal directed transmission of the order and original record to that court for execution, while keeping the remaining execution issues pending.
The Appellate Tribunal stated that its earlier common final order directing release of the attached properties and refund of the detained amount had already been upheld in challenge, and on that basis the appellants were entitled to possession of the properties. It further held that an order under the PMLA is executable as a civil court decree and may be transmitted under section 35(4) to the civil court having local jurisdiction for execution. As the properties were situated within the jurisdiction of the District and Sessions Court, Raigad-Alibag, the Tribunal directed transmission of the order and original record to that court for execution, while keeping the remaining execution issues pending.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.