Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Per-diem received by a non-resident employee for services performed in the United Kingdom was not chargeable to tax in India where the employment was exercised abroad, the stay in India was below the prescribed period, and a UK tax residency certificate was produced. The Tribunal applied Article 16(1) of the India-UK DTAA, read with section 90, and held that remuneration arising from the UK assignment was taxable, if at all, in the United Kingdom and not in India. The addition made by treating the per-diem and related salary adjustment as Indian taxable income was therefore deleted.
Per-diem received by a non-resident employee for services performed in the United Kingdom was not chargeable to tax in India where the employment was exercised abroad, the stay in India was below the prescribed period, and a UK tax residency certificate was produced. The Tribunal applied Article 16(1) of the India-UK DTAA, read with section 90, and held that remuneration arising from the UK assignment was taxable, if at all, in the United Kingdom and not in India. The addition made by treating the per-diem and related salary adjustment as Indian taxable income was therefore deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.