Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A belated challenge to the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction failed because no objection was raised during assessment or before completion of the assessment, and the point was first taken only as an additional ground; the tribunal therefore treated the objection as barred by the statutory time limit. The addition for unexplained money was also sustained because the cash book did not evidence availability of cash on the date of seizure, with no entries for the intervening period and no support for the claim that the cash belonged to the firm or had been withdrawn for purchases. The appeal was dismissed.
A belated challenge to the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction failed because no objection was raised during assessment or before completion of the assessment, and the point was first taken only as an additional ground; the tribunal therefore treated the objection as barred by the statutory time limit. The addition for unexplained money was also sustained because the cash book did not evidence availability of cash on the date of seizure, with no entries for the intervening period and no support for the claim that the cash belonged to the firm or had been withdrawn for purchases. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
