Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
A belated challenge to the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction failed because no objection was raised during assessment or before completion of the assessment, and the point was first taken only as an additional ground; the tribunal therefore treated the objection as barred by the statutory time limit. The addition for unexplained money was also sustained because the cash book did not evidence availability of cash on the date of seizure, with no entries for the intervening period and no support for the claim that the cash belonged to the firm or had been withdrawn for purchases. The appeal was dismissed.
A belated challenge to the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction failed because no objection was raised during assessment or before completion of the assessment, and the point was first taken only as an additional ground; the tribunal therefore treated the objection as barred by the statutory time limit. The addition for unexplained money was also sustained because the cash book did not evidence availability of cash on the date of seizure, with no entries for the intervening period and no support for the claim that the cash belonged to the firm or had been withdrawn for purchases. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
