Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
The ITAT held that foreign salary earned in Sweden and credited to a Swedish bank account formed part of a foreign asset for Black Money Act purposes, so any taxability would arise only in the year the asset came to the AO's notice, not in the year the salary was earned. On the facts, information reached the Department only in November 2021, making the AY 2016-17 addition unsustainable. The Tribunal also applied Article 15(1) of the India-Sweden DTAA and section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act, holding that the salary was not chargeable to tax in India because the employment was exercised in Sweden for a Swedish resident employer. The additions for AY 2016-17 and AY 2018-19 were deleted.
The ITAT held that foreign salary earned in Sweden and credited to a Swedish bank account formed part of a foreign asset for Black Money Act purposes, so any taxability would arise only in the year the asset came to the AO's notice, not in the year the salary was earned. On the facts, information reached the Department only in November 2021, making the AY 2016-17 addition unsustainable. The Tribunal also applied Article 15(1) of the India-Sweden DTAA and section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act, holding that the salary was not chargeable to tax in India because the employment was exercised in Sweden for a Swedish resident employer. The additions for AY 2016-17 and AY 2018-19 were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
