Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Assessment under the Black Money Act starts only on service of notice under section 10, so no assessment proceedings exist in law before that date. On that basis, time excluded for foreign information exchange under Explanation 1 to section 11 can cover only the period overlapping with the running assessment period, not any earlier period before notice service. The Tribunal held that the Revenue wrongly excluded pre-notice time, and the assessment was completed after the last permissible date. The order was therefore time-barred, without jurisdiction and non est, and was quashed; the merits were left open and the departmental appeal became infructuous.
Assessment under the Black Money Act starts only on service of notice under section 10, so no assessment proceedings exist in law before that date. On that basis, time excluded for foreign information exchange under Explanation 1 to section 11 can cover only the period overlapping with the running assessment period, not any earlier period before notice service. The Tribunal held that the Revenue wrongly excluded pre-notice time, and the assessment was completed after the last permissible date. The order was therefore time-barred, without jurisdiction and non est, and was quashed; the merits were left open and the departmental appeal became infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
