Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
521 to 540 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Inadvertent availment of common input service credit did not bar the higher rate of duty drawback where the CENVAT credit was reversed with interest before issuance of the show cause notice. Applying Chandrapur Magnet Wires and Precot Meridian, the HC treated the reversal as curing the prior availment for drawback purposes and rejected the argument that the Supreme Court authority lacked binding force. Emphasising the export-promoting object of drawback schemes, the Court held that a hyper-technical objection was unwarranted and set aside the revisional order, holding the exporter entitled to the applicable drawback rate for the relevant period.
Inadvertent availment of common input service credit did not bar the higher rate of duty drawback where the CENVAT credit was reversed with interest before issuance of the show cause notice. Applying Chandrapur Magnet Wires and Precot Meridian, the HC treated the reversal as curing the prior availment for drawback purposes and rejected the argument that the Supreme Court authority lacked binding force. Emphasising the export-promoting object of drawback schemes, the Court held that a hyper-technical objection was unwarranted and set aside the revisional order, holding the exporter entitled to the applicable drawback rate for the relevant period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
