Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
A Section 97 order appointing a Resolution Professional in personal guarantor insolvency proceedings was set aside because it rested on misrepresentation of foundational jurisdictional facts. The NCLAT found that the creditor had proceeded as if a deed of guarantee and invocation letter were on record, even though the assignment documents showed guarantors as nil and the creditor later admitted that no such documents had been filed. Since proceedings under Section 95 depend on proper foundational materials, the order was held vitiated and void ab initio for misrepresentation, applying the principle that an order obtained by fraud or misstatement cannot stand. Liberty was granted to file a fresh Section 95 application with the relevant documents.
A Section 97 order appointing a Resolution Professional in personal guarantor insolvency proceedings was set aside because it rested on misrepresentation of foundational jurisdictional facts. The NCLAT found that the creditor had proceeded as if a deed of guarantee and invocation letter were on record, even though the assignment documents showed guarantors as nil and the creditor later admitted that no such documents had been filed. Since proceedings under Section 95 depend on proper foundational materials, the order was held vitiated and void ab initio for misrepresentation, applying the principle that an order obtained by fraud or misstatement cannot stand. Liberty was granted to file a fresh Section 95 application with the relevant documents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.