Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
A Section 97 order appointing a Resolution Professional in personal guarantor insolvency proceedings was set aside because it rested on misrepresentation of foundational jurisdictional facts. The NCLAT found that the creditor had proceeded as if a deed of guarantee and invocation letter were on record, even though the assignment documents showed guarantors as nil and the creditor later admitted that no such documents had been filed. Since proceedings under Section 95 depend on proper foundational materials, the order was held vitiated and void ab initio for misrepresentation, applying the principle that an order obtained by fraud or misstatement cannot stand. Liberty was granted to file a fresh Section 95 application with the relevant documents.
A Section 97 order appointing a Resolution Professional in personal guarantor insolvency proceedings was set aside because it rested on misrepresentation of foundational jurisdictional facts. The NCLAT found that the creditor had proceeded as if a deed of guarantee and invocation letter were on record, even though the assignment documents showed guarantors as nil and the creditor later admitted that no such documents had been filed. Since proceedings under Section 95 depend on proper foundational materials, the order was held vitiated and void ab initio for misrepresentation, applying the principle that an order obtained by fraud or misstatement cannot stand. Liberty was granted to file a fresh Section 95 application with the relevant documents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
