Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
A renewed challenge to the implementation of an approved resolution plan was barred by res judicata and constructive res judicata because the same issues had already been raised in earlier proceedings, the plan approval had attained finality, and prior appeals had failed. The NCLAT held that the appellant could not reopen its status or quantum of dues as a secured operational creditor by filing another appeal against the same common order, and its refusal to accept the plan amount was obstructing completion of the insolvency process. It also held that an approved resolution plan must be implemented unconditionally, so post-approval liabilities cannot be added or made contingent on further clarifications. The appeal and interlocutory application were dismissed, with directions for compliance.
A renewed challenge to the implementation of an approved resolution plan was barred by res judicata and constructive res judicata because the same issues had already been raised in earlier proceedings, the plan approval had attained finality, and prior appeals had failed. The NCLAT held that the appellant could not reopen its status or quantum of dues as a secured operational creditor by filing another appeal against the same common order, and its refusal to accept the plan amount was obstructing completion of the insolvency process. It also held that an approved resolution plan must be implemented unconditionally, so post-approval liabilities cannot be added or made contingent on further clarifications. The appeal and interlocutory application were dismissed, with directions for compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
