Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
For e-filed appeals under Section 61 of the IBC, limitation is computed from the date of e-filing, in line with the NCLAT's 24.12.2022 directions issued under the NCLAT Rules, 2016. The Tribunal rejected reliance on Delhi High Court e-filing rules because no material showed they applied to NCLAT. It applied the Supreme Court's view that a statutory day runs for 24 hours from midnight, so filing after office hours does not shift the filing date to the next working day. An appeal e-filed at 9.00 p.m. on the 45th day was therefore within the condonable period, and the 15-day delay was condoned.
For e-filed appeals under Section 61 of the IBC, limitation is computed from the date of e-filing, in line with the NCLAT's 24.12.2022 directions issued under the NCLAT Rules, 2016. The Tribunal rejected reliance on Delhi High Court e-filing rules because no material showed they applied to NCLAT. It applied the Supreme Court's view that a statutory day runs for 24 hours from midnight, so filing after office hours does not shift the filing date to the next working day. An appeal e-filed at 9.00 p.m. on the 45th day was therefore within the condonable period, and the 15-day delay was condoned.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.